Political Reform
The never ending ongoing political reform debate is a never ending source of amusement and befuddlement for anyone with even paltry knowledge about the effects of political institutions. Fernando Rodrigues, for example, claims that the system as it is, which is to say as dysfunctional as it is, is better than most proposed reforms. Although I do not agree with the specifics of his arguments, he is probably correct in the overall assessment.
Case in point, the proposed reforms that the Câmara president, Arlindo Chinaglia, wants to start discussing on the floor in the next week or so. It proposes to change to a closed list proportional electoral system. Comparative scholars everywhere know that such a system is purported to increase the roll call discipline of legislators. The mechanism is simple, legislators that do not behave in accordance to the political party recommendations risk not being placed at or near the top of the list in the next election.
And herein lies is the Brazilian twist: in the proposed reform, legislators running for reelection are placed at the top of the list by default! plus ça change …
Read on for the relevant excerpt from the bill (in Portuguese.)